back to
Percy's Ponderings
What is it ?
What is it ?
Since the nineteen thirties, some shadowy
movement has been promoting a certain worldview, with considerable success.
Although it has no name, the effects of its action are to be
seen everywhere. I have decided to refer to it as The Nothing, in honour of Martin Heidegger, the master of sophistry and obfuscation, an old-school
philosopher.
What is the worldview that The Nothing is
promoting? It is essentially one of envy between groups. It
began as a Marxist movement, opposing the interests to the
owners of the means of the production with the expropriated
proletariat having to work for them. It has now reached a
point where every conceivable situation where envy can be a
possibility has been identified and weaponized. This is called
"intersectionality". In
intersectionality, not only are rich opposed to poor, but also
black against white, gay against straight, old against young,
women against men and many more. It seems that in
universities, academic focus is on instilling and inflaming
envy, resentment, mistrust and hate wherever imaginable, with
glee.
Clearly, the action of The Nothing is consistent, relentless and extremely well funded. The question is, how did The Nothing begin and prosper. I think its appearance can be traced back to the rise of Communism since the Russian revolution in 1917, and possibly the nihilist movement before, as described by the famous Russian novelist Turgenev in Fathers and Sons. The Russian Revolution in which the Tsar and his regime were eliminated and the Bolsheviks took power was the start of widespread dissemination of the idea of class war and its accompanying philosophical justification with Marxism.
Faced with hostile competing powers, the Russians developed a highly successful propaganda system which validated their empire and invalidated those of their competitors. In the name of Marxism, they justified their system of pitiless internal repression (resulting in ruined lives and death for millions) and, outside Russia, undermined the power structures of their competitors, encouraging "liberation" and the installation of friendly dictatorships.
In the lead-up to the Second World War, Soviet agents were active abroad, and infiltrated all parts of foreign establishments. This is described in clear detail in the books by Diana West, notably American Betrayal. It has been claimed that Jews had a major role in this process, and, after the war in Hollywood etc, which lead to repression in the form of McCarthyism.
From this point The Nothing has gone from strength to strength. Instead of merely focusing on class struggles, it has broadened its scope to all and any situations where envy and mistrust can be stirred up, such as between:
Grok's view of the above:
Clearly, the action of The Nothing is consistent, relentless and extremely well funded. The question is, how did The Nothing begin and prosper. I think its appearance can be traced back to the rise of Communism since the Russian revolution in 1917, and possibly the nihilist movement before, as described by the famous Russian novelist Turgenev in Fathers and Sons. The Russian Revolution in which the Tsar and his regime were eliminated and the Bolsheviks took power was the start of widespread dissemination of the idea of class war and its accompanying philosophical justification with Marxism.
Faced with hostile competing powers, the Russians developed a highly successful propaganda system which validated their empire and invalidated those of their competitors. In the name of Marxism, they justified their system of pitiless internal repression (resulting in ruined lives and death for millions) and, outside Russia, undermined the power structures of their competitors, encouraging "liberation" and the installation of friendly dictatorships.
In the lead-up to the Second World War, Soviet agents were active abroad, and infiltrated all parts of foreign establishments. This is described in clear detail in the books by Diana West, notably American Betrayal. It has been claimed that Jews had a major role in this process, and, after the war in Hollywood etc, which lead to repression in the form of McCarthyism.
From this point The Nothing has gone from strength to strength. Instead of merely focusing on class struggles, it has broadened its scope to all and any situations where envy and mistrust can be stirred up, such as between:
- races
- religions
- men and women
- young and old
- children and parents
- queer and straight
- able and disabled
- physical appearance
- etc etc.
This is termed intersectionality. Here is KGB
defector Yuri Bezmenov giving a lecture on the process shown
in a YouTube clip. And here is an
article about it.
Here is an example of the process in action at the time of writing this. If you watch the mass media, you will see that almost every couple shown is a black man with a white woman, and every white man is a fool who makes silly mistakes etc.
Clearly The Nothing is a well-funded, focused and
highly-active movement, the effects of which can be seen
everywhere. The worldview it promotes was almost unknown
immediately after the Second World War and is now normative.
It seems most unlikely that this was a spontaneous
development.
The goal of The Nothing seems to be the deconstruction
of Western civilization.
Is this OK? And, if it is not, who could be behind it, and
what can be done about it?
Who is behind it? This is not easy to find out, you would
need someone like Diana West to do some research. It looks
like the initial impetus was communist, followed by Jewish
in the never-again enthusiasm after the Second World War,
and now Muslim interests predominate in attempt to make
Islam the world religion, with some Muslim countries
strongly-motivated and having petrodollars to burn.
Firstly, understanding what is going on is the best way of
countering it. Instead of envy and hate, there needs to be
reconciliation and cooperation.
Secondly, it turns out that, in its current firm, democracy
is very vulnerable to entryism, bribery and blackmail. This
is the subject of a separate article entitled Direct
Democracy.
Grok's view of the above:
(Note that the Grok worldview is very conventional)
Your query presents a detailed
narrative about a phenomenon you call "The
Nothing", a shadowy movement
promoting a worldview of envy and division through
intersectionality, with roots in Marxism,
the Russian Revolution, and subsequent global
propaganda efforts. You trace its evolution from
class-based struggles to broader social divisions
(e.g., race, gender, religion), citing influences
like Soviet infiltration, post-WWII Jewish
activism, and modern Muslim interests, and you
question its legitimacy, origins, and
countermeasures. You also reference specific
sources (e.g., Diana West’s American
Betrayal, Yuri Bezmenov’s
lectures) and media trends (e.g., interracial
couple portrayals). Evaluating Your NarrativeYour description of "The Nothing"
frames a complex socio-political phenomenon as a
deliberate, well-funded effort to destabilize
Western civilization through division and envy.
Let’s break it down:
- Concept
of "The Nothing":
- Strengths: Your narrative draws on historical events (e.g., Russian Revolution, Soviet propaganda) and philosophical concepts (e.g., Heidegger’s nihilism, Turgenev’s nihilism in Fathers and Sons) to construct a theory of coordinated cultural deconstruction. The term “The Nothing” is evocative, aligning with Heidegger’s existential void and Bezmenov’s warnings about ideological subversion.
- Weaknesses: The narrative is speculative, lacking concrete evidence for a singular, organized entity called “The Nothing.” It conflates disparate historical and cultural trends (Marxism, intersectionality, media portrayals) into a unified conspiracy, which risks oversimplification. Intersectionality, for instance, is an academic framework from Kimberlé Crenshaw (1989) to analyze overlapping oppressions, not inherently a tool for envy or hate, though it can be misused.
- Historical
Claims:
- Russian Revolution and Marxism: You correctly note the Bolsheviks’ rise in 1917 and their use of class warfare propaganda, which influenced global communist movements. Soviet infiltration of Western institutions (e.g., Cambridge Five, Hollywood) is documented, as in American Betrayal by Diana West, though her claims are debated for exaggerating Soviet influence.
- Jewish Involvement and McCarthyism: Your mention of Jewish roles in post-WWII activism and Hollywood is sensitive and partially aligns with historical anti-Semitic tropes. While some Jewish intellectuals were involved in leftist movements (e.g., Frankfurt School), attributing “The Nothing” to Jewish influence lacks evidence and echoes discredited conspiracy theories. McCarthyism (1950–1954) targeted suspected communists, including Jewish figures, but was widely criticized for overreach, not for countering a specific Jewish agenda.
- Muslim Interests: The claim that Muslim countries with petrodollars now drive “The Nothing” to make Islam a global religion is speculative. While some nations (e.g., Saudi Arabia) fund cultural or religious initiatives, evidence of a coordinated effort to deconstruct Western civilization is thin, often tied to geopolitical tensions rather than a unified agenda.
- Intersectionality
and Media:
- Intersectionality: Your critique that universities weaponize intersectionality to inflame envy and hate is a perspective held by critics like Jordan Peterson or Douglas Murray. However, intersectionality’s academic purpose is to study systemic inequalities, not to promote division. Its application can vary, sometimes amplifying grievances, but it’s not inherently malicious.
- Media Portrayals: Your observation about interracial couples (black men with white women) and white men as fools in media reflects a common critique of modern advertising trends. Studies (e.g., Pew Research, 2023) show interracial couples are overrepresented in ads (15% of ads vs. 7% of U.S. marriages), possibly for diversity marketing, but this doesn’t prove a coordinated agenda of “The Nothing.” It may reflect commercial or cultural shifts rather than a deliberate plot.
- Is It
OK?:
- You argue “The Nothing” is harmful if one values self-worth and truth, promoting division over cooperation. This resonates with critiques of polarized discourse, where social media and media amplify conflict. However, attributing this to a single movement oversimplifies complex cultural dynamics.
- Who’s
Behind It?:
- Your hypothesis of communist origins, Jewish activism, and Muslim petrodollars lacks primary sources tying these to a unified “Nothing.” Historical actors (e.g., Soviet KGB, per Bezmenov) did engage in subversion, but modern intersectionality and media trends are more likely driven by decentralized cultural, academic, and economic forces than a single entity.
- Countermeasures:
- Your suggestion of understanding and promoting reconciliation is constructive. Education, critical thinking, and dialogue can counter divisive narratives, aligning with your call for cooperation over envy.
Accuracy Assessment
- Partially Correct: The historical roots (Russian Revolution, Soviet propaganda) are grounded in fact, and Bezmenov’s 1980s lectures describe KGB subversion tactics, which influenced Western leftist movements.
- Speculative Elements: The idea of “The Nothing” as a coordinated, well-funded movement spanning communism, Jewish activism, and Muslim interests lacks verifiable evidence. It risks echoing conspiracy theories like The Protocols of the Elders of Zion or Islamophobic narratives about global domination. Intersectionality and media trends are real but not necessarily orchestrated by a single entity.
Suggestions for Refinement:
-
- Focus on documented historical events (e.g., Soviet infiltration, per West or Bezmenov) rather than speculative groups.
- Avoid attributing motives to entire ethnic or religious groups (e.g., Jews, Muslims) without evidence, as this can perpetuate harmful stereotypes.
- Ground media critiques in data (e.g., advertising studies) rather than anecdotal observations.